The main theorem of elliptic regularity is the following:
Theorem(Local elliptic regularity)
Let L be a differential operator of order k≥1 on Rn, U⊆Rn precompact and L elliptic over Uˉ. Then
There is a constant A such that for all u∈Hs+k(U), we have
∥u∥s+k≤A(∥u∥s+∥Lu∥s).
If u∈Hr for some r is such that Lu∈Hs for some s, then μu∈Hs+k(U) for every μ∈Cc∞(U).
The first part requires getting our hands dirty and proving explicit estimates. A proof sketch will be given here, with the details carried out in the Appendix.
Proof
□
[Proof sketch of (1)] First prove it if L has constant coefficients, which is easy since
Lu(ξ)=p(ξ)u^(ξ)
for some polynomial p.
Next, for arbitrary L, we show that for any x∈x0, there is a neighbourhood V⊆U such that the estimate holds for all u supported in V. To do so, let L0 be the differential operator with constant coefficients that agree with L at x0. We then have to bound ∥(L−L0)u∥s on the assumption that the coefficients of L−L0 can be made arbitrarily small near the support of u.
Finally, use compactness and partitions of unity to glue these results together.
Proof
□
The second part follows from the first formally.
Observe the first part tells us if we already knew that u were in Hs+k, then ∥u∥s+k would be very well-behaved. This is an a priori estimate. To show that u is actually in Hs+k, we apply appropriate smooth approximations.
Fix a ϕ∈Cc∞(Rn) such that
ϕ≥0,∫ϕdx=1,ϕ(−x)=ϕ(x).
For ε>0, we define
ϕε(x)=εn1ϕ(εx).
We then define the mollifier
Fε:C∞(Rn)u→C∞(Rn)↦ϕε∗u.
The main theorem about mollifiers, which I will not prove, is that
Theorem
Fε extends to a bounded operator Hs→Hs with norm ≤1. Moreover
Fε commutes with all differential operators with constant coefficients.
If L is a differential operator with compact support, then [Fε,L] extends to a map Hs→Hs−k+1 for all s∈R, and has uniformly bounded operator norm.
For any u∈Hs, we have Fεu∈C∞∩Hs.
For any u∈Hs, we have Fεu→u in Hs.
If U⊆Rn is precompact and u∈Hr(U) for some r<s, and ∥Ftu∥s is uniformly bounded in t, then u∈Hs(U).
The last point is how we are going to show that u∈Hs+k(U), while the others are needed to establish the required bounds.
Proof
□
[Proof of (2) from (1)] Inductively, we may assume μu∈Hs+k−1. We then bound
∥Fεμu∥s+k≤A(∥Fεμu∥s+∥LFεμu∥s)≤A(∥Fεμu∥s+∥[L,Fε]μu∥s+∥Fε[L,μ]u∥s+∥FεμLu∥s)≤A∥μu∥s+A1∥μu∥s+k−1+A2∥u∥s+k−1+A3∥Lu∥s,
where for the third term, we used that [L,μ] is a differential operator of degree k−1.