Let S be the sphere spectrum. Then S is, in particular, a commutative ring spectrum (i.e. a commutative monoid in the stable homotopy category), using the canonical identification S∧S→∼S. Let p be a prime. We seek the answer the following question:
Question
When is S/p a ring spectrum?
To turn S/p into a ring spectrum, we have to solve the extension problem
and then check associativity of the multiplication map (unitality is clear).
To solve the extension problem, we factor the left vertical map as S∧S→S∧S/p→S/p∧S/p, and observe that there is an extension to S∧S/p given essentially by the identity map. Thus we have to solve
Here the vertical maps form a cofibration sequence, so solving the lifting problem is equivalent to showing that p:S/p→S/p is zero, or equivalently, that [S/p,S/p]=Z/pZ. This can be calculated via a sequence of homotopy long exact sequence calculations using S→S→S/p, or we can do it more systematically via the Adams spectral sequence.
Since S/p is the cofiber of p:S→S, we can compute its (co)homology using the cellular chain complex. We find that
Lemma
HFp∗(S/p) is Fp in degrees 0 and 1, and vanishes otherwise. The Bockstein homomorphism acts non-trivially between the degrees.
Dualizing, we get
Corollary
As a Steenrod comodule, we have
(HFp)∗(S/p)={E(ξ1)E(τ0)p=2p>2.
Note that when
p=2, the comodule
E(ξ1) is not a subalgebra of the Steenrod algebra, where
ξ1 is not nilpotent. This immediately lets us conclude
Proposition
E(ξ1) does not have the structure of a comodule algebra. Hence S/2 does not admit a ring structure.
Write
ψ for the comodule action. If
E(ξ1) had an algebra structure, then
ψ(ξ12)=ψ(ξ1)2=ξ12⊗1+1⊗ξ12.
However, the image of ψ in A⊗E(ξ1) is given by linear combinations of 1⊗1 and ξ1⊗1+1⊗ξ1.
Alternatively, we can compute π2(S/2) using the Adams spectral sequence and show that it has order 4 elements, hence 2:S/2→S/2 is non-zero.
For p>3, we shall show that the spectrum S/p does admit a commutative ring spectrum structure.
Noting that S/p is already p-local, the Adams spectral sequence gives us
E2s,t=ExtA∗s,t(E(τ0),E(τ0))⇒[Σt−sS/p,S/p].
By the change of rings theorem, we can write
E2s,t=ExtA∗//E(τ0)s,t(E(τ0),F2)=ExtA∗//E(τ0)s,t(F2,F2)⊗F2{1,x}
where x∈E20,−1, since E(τ0) is a trivial A∗//E(τ0) comodule.
Now the terms of lowest degree in A∗//E(τ0) are generated by ξ1 and have degree 2p−2. So in the cobar complex, we see that apart from F2{1,x}, all terms have t−s≥2p−3. In particular,
Lemma
[S/p,S/p]=Z/pZ.
This tells us we can solve our original extension problem. We can actually go further and understand the set of possible lifts. This amounts to understanding the kernel of the map
[S/p∧S/p,S/p]→[S∧S,S/p].
This is not difficult because we can use the same technique to compute these groups explicitly. Using Künneth's formula and the same calculation, we find that
Lemma
Let p>3. Then [S/p∧k,S/p]=Z/pZ for k=1,2,3. More precisely, the maps
[S/p∧k,S/p]→[S∧k,S/p]
are bijections for k=1,2,3.
We can directly calculate the value of
[S/p∧k,S/p]. To see that the map we wrote down in particular is a bijection, we note that both sides are
Z/pZ, and the map is non-zero since the unit map
S→S/p is in the image.
In particular, the case of
k=2 tells us there is a unique choice of
μ:S/p∧S/p→S/p up to homotopy, and in particular, since the map
S∧S→S/p is symmetric in the
S's, the same is true of
μ. Similarly, the
k=3 case tells us the multiplication is associative, since that is true for
S.
Answer
S/2 does not admit the structure of a ring spectrum.
S/3 has a multiplication but is not (necessarily) associative.
S/p is a (homotopy) commutative ring spectrum for p>3.