We now turn to the heat equation. As usual, we define
Δ1=D∗D,Δ2=DD∗,
and consider e−tΔi. Our objective is to understand
K(t)=∬K1,t(y,u;y,u)−K2,t(y,u;y,u)dydu,
where Ki,t(y,u;z,v) is the kernel of e−tΔi. We do not make any claims about how this relates to an index (or not), since we are working on a non-compact manifold and life is tough.
We first consider Δ1, which is explicitly
Δ1=−∂u2∂2+A2.
We again perform separation of variables. We write our potential solution as ∑fλ(u,t)ψλ(x). Our boundary conditions are then
Pf=0,(1−P)Df=0.
Note that the first equation constrains fλ for λ≥0, and the second constrains fλ for λ<0. So we have a single constraint for each fλ.
To find the fundamental solution for e−tΔ1, we have to find a fundamental solution for the operator
∂t∂−∂u2∂2+λ2.
Up to the λ, this is just the classical heat equation.
For the boundary condition when λ≥0 we can simply write down the fundamental solution to be
Recall that in the compact case, this expression is identically equal to the index of the operator D. In this case, we have
K(t)→−21dimkerA as t→∞.
Writing h=dimkerA, we see that in fact K(t)+2h→0 exponentially as t→∞.
To understand this better, we define the η function
η(s)=λ=0∑signλ∣λ∣s,
where of course we sum over eigenvalues of A with multiplicity. One should think of this as some sort of Dirichlet L-function for the spectrum. To relate this to K(t), we first observe that
K′(t)=4πt1λ∑λe−λ2t.
So after integration by parts once, we find that, at least formally,
where ΘN is holomorphic for Re(s)>−21(N+1−d/2). Taking N to be large enough, we know that η admits a meromorphic continuation to the whole plane, and the value at 0 is