5 Galois Theory
The usual proof of the usual Fundamental Theorem of Galois Theory can pretty much be carried over to the general case if we can say the word “Galois”. Fortunately, the word is not too difficult to utter.
Definition
(Galois cover)
A Galois cover of X is an element Y∈FEtX such that Aut(Y) acts transitively on F(Y).
The following proposition should be reassuring, but will not be used.
Proposition
Let Y∈FEtX be Galois. Then Y×XY splits as finitely many disjoint copies of Y, and Aut(Y) acts freely and transitively over the copies, where Aut(Y) acts as an automorphism of π1:Y×XY→Y by pullback.
The diagonal map
Y→Y×XY gives an isomorphism between
Y and a component of
Y×XY. We fix a geometric point
z∈F(Y), and then we have a diagram
By definition of the pullback, the lifts of z to Y×XY bijects with the lifts of x to Y, and this preserves the action of Aut(Y). Since Aut(Y) acts freely on the lifts of z, it must act freely on Y⊆Y×XY. So Y×XY splits as n copies of Y, and there is nothing left since Y×XY→Y has degree n.
In Galois theory, we can construct Galois closures. We can do the same here.
Lemma
Let Y∈FEtX be connected. Then there is a Galois cover Y′ with a map Y′→Y such that if Z∈FEtX is any Galois cover, then any map Z→Y factors through Y′.
In Galois theory, the Galois closure is constructed by taking the field generated by all field embeddings into the algebraic closure. The construction here is similar.
Let
y1,…,yn∈F(Y), which gives rise to a geometric point
y=(y1,…,yn)∈Yn. Let
Y′ be the component of
y∈Yn, mapping to
Y by first projection. This is an étale cover since it is a connected component of one. We claim that this works.
Claim
If (x1,…,xn)∈Y′, then xi=xj for all i and j.
If
πi,j:Yn→Y2 is the projection onto the
i,j coordinates, then this is the same as saying
πij−1(Δ(Y))∩Y′=∅. But since
Δ(Y) is open and closed and
πij−1 is continuous, we know
πij−1(Δ(Y))∩Y′ is either
Y′ or empty. But it does not contain
(y1,…,yn)∈Y′. So it is empty.
Claim
Y′→X is Galois.
Any element in
F(Yn) is of the form
(xi1,…,xin), and by the above, if it is in
Y′, then it is of the form
(xσ(1),…,xσ(n)) for some permutation
σ∈Sn. This
σ also acts on
Xn by permuting the coordinates, and
σ(Y′)∩Y′ is non-empty since it contains
(xσ(1),…,xσ(n)). So
σ(Y′)=Y′, and hence
σ∈Aut(Y′). So
Aut(Y′) acts transitively on
F(Y′).
Claim
If Z is Galois and q:Z→Y, then it factors through Y′.
Fix a lift z∈F(Z). Then by composing with automorphisms of Aut(Z), we can pick maps q1,…,qn:Z→Y such that qi(z)=yi. Then the image of (q1,…,qn):Z→Yn includes a point in Y′, namely y, and hence maps into Y′ by connectedness of Z.
Theorem
Let (Xα)α⊆FEtX be the poset of Galois covers of X, ordered under Xα≤Xβ if there is a morphism Xβ→Xα. For each Xα, pick a point xα∈F(Xα). Then if Xα≤Xβ, we pick the morphism that sends xα to xβ for use in the pro-system. Then this pro-system pro-represents F.
This is indeed a pro-system since the pullback of two Galois covers is yet another Galois cover of
X. There is a natural transformation
colimHom(Xα,Y)→F(Y)
that sends a map q:Xα→Y to q(xα). Conversely, given any y∈F(Y), we may restrict to the component of y and assume Y is connected. Then since Xα→Y is surjective and Aut(Xα) acts transitively on F(Xα), precomposing with an automorphism gives a morphism Xα→Y that sends xα to y, and such a map is unique since Aut(Xα) acts freely. This gives the desired inverse map.
Theorem
FEtX is naturally equivalent to the category of continuous finite π1(X,x)-sets.
The functor is given by
F. Conversely, given a continuous finite
π1(X,x) set
S, pick
Xα such that
Aut(Xα) acts transitively with stabilizer
H. Then
X≅F(Xα)/H≅F(Xα/H). Functions can be constructed similarly.